Monthly Archives: May 2006

"I felt physically sick"

Tuesday - 30 May 2006

After a mix-up in a fertility clinic, this white couple ended up with a pair of mixed-race kids. An Asian man's sperm was used by accident. I'm not sure who put the emphasis on race in the way this Sun article, but it's easy to infer from it that the colour of the two twins was as much a problem as their paternity.

This reminds me of something I was pondering the other day. Colin Powell is, apparently, 1/8th black. That is to say, he's 7/8ths white. So why is he considered to be a black man? This is the sort of dilemma which gives the lie to any sort of colour-based classification of people. I know that some people find it tough being colourblind, but it would make things much easier.

More or less

Friday - 26 May 2006

Quick one: a colleague of my fiancée undertook a week-long course in Aragón somewhere. It was a residential/intensive sort of deal and went well. At some point during the week, in the midst of a debate, Gemma's colleague used the English phrase "…more or less…". Her English teacher, who is Spanish, reprimanded her and advised that "more or less" is an import into English from the Spanish "mas o menos". She was told, in no uncertain terms, that the average Englishman wouldn't understand what was meant by the phrase.

Now, wishy-washy as it is, I'm pretty sure that "more or less" is not a Spanish invention. I'm not sure how to prove this, but I'd go further and say that Spanish hasn't had much influence on English, when compared with – say – Urdu, French, Hindi and others. Besides, I'm convinced that any natural English speaker would understand the possible equivocation of this simple term.
Oh, and I've just had a question read out on BBC Five Live. And sort of half answered by historian Niall Ferguson.

Nationalism and Catalonia (Part I)

Friday - 26 May 2006

Nationalism plays a major part in Spanish politics. In the press, both here and abroad, nationalism in Spain nearly always refers to Basque or Catalan separatist movements. Doubtless this focus is due partly to the violent campaign waged by armed Basque group ETA; and partly because perceived nationalism amongst minorities makes a shriller sound than the deep underlying drone of majority nationalism.

This majority nationalism – Spanish nationalism – is probably the single strongest political force in Spain today. Nearly half of all voters here can be accurately described as at least sympathetic to the Spanish nationalist agenda – that is: cetralised power in Madrid, no further autonomy for the regions, Spain is one nation: indivisible.

Opposition leader, Mariano Rajoy recently travelled around Spain collecting signatures of people who wanted a Spain-wide referendum on whether Catalonia should be allowed to claim more rights of self-governance. He managed to collect 4.5 million names. Putting aside for the moment more general criticisms of Rajoy's politics, this is clearly a large number of people. Considering that there must have been many who would have signed had they had the opportunity to, or if they'd been pressed to, we can see that Rajoy's petition – while not 'the single largest political movement in democratic Spain' as some right-wingers claimed – had the support of wide swathes of the Spanish population.

While the focus here in Catalonia is always on the two major Catalanista parties (ERC and CiU) and one increasingly Catalanista bloc (PSC), little time seems to be spent considering the reasons behind the growth of the separatist movement. As Giles Tremlett ably points out in Ghosts of Spain, almost anyone you ask about the issue has trenchant views on the debate. Whether in favour of independence, against independence, or sick of the entire question (this counts for a lot of people), Catalonia and Catalan independentism are seriously hot potatoes.

I reckon that the key arguments behind Catalan independentism are actually not nationalist, per se. Of course, political parties who are ostensibly in favour of greater autonomy often use nationalist rhetoric to win votes. To a greater degree though, the 'nationalist' tag is usually applied by opponents of the movement, often by the same people who can be accurately described as Spanish nationalists. The main arguments I hear over and over again are historical (some Catalans still feel that their land is occupied by the Spanish), left-wing (Catalonia has developed a rare breed of business-savvy socialism which doesn't marry at all well with the aims of certain Spanish political parties), and a sense of difference, so difficult to describe that I'm going to have to come back to it at a later date.

All nationalism is stupid, more or less.
More next week…

==

On a related note, just a couple of thoughts about politicians. Of course they're all there to gain power for themselves, to some degree. But this doesn't mean that none of them  have any values. It seems that if we dismiss all politicans as liars, all parties as morally bankrupt and all political philosophy as bunkum then not only do we damn the population as stupid (which I find an abhorrent attitude), but also we end up with politicians and parties who fulfill our worst expectations.

Enron bosses found guilty

Friday - 26 May 2006

It's the result we've been waiting for: Kenneth Lay, a close friend of the Bush family has been found guilty of fraud and conspiracy after the collapse of Enron, the company he founded. This classic case of corporate corruption has already been outdone by the WorldCom fiasco, yet the result is significant.

The best thing one can say for Bush at this time is that the courts have been seen to do the right thing. Lay was a major benefactor to the Bush election campaign… but he had links with Clinton too.

This whole case (with its stories of huge extravagence and luxury enjoyed by Enron executives) suports two clear truths: that corporate business will generally bend the law when it knows it can, and break the law when it thinks it can; and that no major political party today can claim innocence when it come to dealings with shady businessmen.

The system doesn't work. Who's going to have the strength to stand up and say it needs fixing? My bet: no one.

Acebes misuses the 'F' word

Monday - 22 May 2006

It is a fascist practice to attribute to a political party intentions that it does not have

So says Angel Acebes, attributing the fascist tag – most incorrectly – to the Socialist Party of Catalonia (PSC). The reason that Acebes has decided to use the 'F' word so ill-advisedly is that the PSC is campaigning for a 'yes' vote in the forthcoming Estatut referendum with the catchphrase 'The PP will use your 'No' vote against Catalonia'.

Obviously, the PP find this grossly unfair and have thus redefined fascism in order to use the label against their Catalan opponents. An amusing aspect of this new definition of fascism is that by definition, it also applies to the PP who, by trying to redefine the term in order that it apply to the PSC, are themselves attributing false labels and intentions to their rivals.

Another amusing thing about all this is that the PP seem to be missing the point. This has nothing to do with them, and everything to do with two radically opposed Catalan parties: Esquerra Republicana de Catalunya (ERC) and Ciutadans de Catalunya (CC). Both of these parties are opposed to the Estatut, but for wildly differing reasons. ERC say it doesn't go far enough, CC say it goes too far and that all nationalism should be dropped due to its divisive effects.

In their 'yes' campaign, the PSC are trying to warn ERC and CC 'no' voters that they are only really helping the PP with their 'no' votes. While the truth of this angle is debatable, it seems pretty obvious that the PP are not, and never will be, considered a genuine threat to Catalan politics. It is the fear of helping them out in Madrid which the PSC is trying to capitalise on – and they'll probably be successful.

Bolivian privatisation

Saturday - 20 May 2006

In a very revealing article, the Nick Cave of Spanish right wing thought, Jorge Valín has described Bolivia's new government as the 'largest criminal organisation' in Bolivia. What's revealing about the article is how its writer has suddenly abandoned the 'support democracy and the rule of law' attitude which the right wing claim is their own. He also fails to make any  economic case against nationalisation which, given that he's meant to know about that sort of thing, suggests that he cannot find one.

Using emotive moralistic arguments when discussing this sort of issue will convince a lot of people. Imagine if someone did come and take your house: it would be awful. But if that house had previously been owned by a hundred people, taken from then and then sold to you for a penny…? Then it seems that to achieve a more utilitarian solution, the wrong must be righted.

The key here is that no one can deny that it makes good economic and social sense for countries like Bolivia to go through some sort of nationalisation process. The country's wealth in natural resources is enough that Bolivia could achieve 1st world standards of healthcare, education and infrastructure. But foreign oil companies – understandably – want to take their profits to Amsterdam and London (or Madrid), meaning that a lot of the wealth generated by Bolivian workers is simply sucked out of the country.

I accept that although I don't like it much, privitisation is bound to happen again in the future. But let that happen when Bolivia has had the chance to develop the way our countries developed.

As to calling Morales a tyrant, I think that's pretty unfair.

Big Brother returns

Thursday - 18 May 2006

bb_logo_.jpgThat's right, the show which is so bad it's only watched by the very stupid and the highly intelligent, starts its seventh series tonight on Channel 4, with a guarantee of further rehashes and cheaply-produced chat shows across the C4 network. Big Brother is a fascinating TV programme, so don't trust anyone who never watches it. They're either lying or they lack that essential human urge to observe. Either way, they're completely untrustworthy.

The marvel of Big Brother now must be how much further the programme's producers seem willing to push competitors than when the show began. Back in series one, we the public were satisfied with dull monotony: the study of caged human animals. Now we desire blood and sputum, exposed buttocks and bitch fights. I don't believe that Big Brother will end with the death of one or all of its short-lived 'stars'. No, it is you and I who die a little watching this awfulness. But that's exactly what makes it so compelling. Every time a dumb brunette gets a word wrong; every time a 'sensible' chap decides to take charge – and fails miserably; every time a male model claims that his opinion has some intrinsic value, even though that opinion is patently even inherently worthless: we are offered the false choice of becoming one with the stupidity or pretending to be above it.

We're all down there already.

Big Brother starts tonight at about 9 or something on Channel 4.
For a fascinating read, try Neil Hagerty's Big Brother diary from 2000. No explanations, no rewards.

Campions! FC Barcelona 2 Arsenal 1

Wednesday - 17 May 2006

They kept us waiting but they got there in the end. Thierry Henry seemed extremely pissed off: "They're a great team, and if you help them…" he said, referring to perceived mistakes by the refferee.

Well it's tough losing, Thierry. But will this result end up with you not coming to Barcelona? We'll have to wait for that, I suppose… but to be fair, I don't think they need you.

In the age old style, Arsenal cabron! Saludo Campion!

Força Barça!

Wednesday - 17 May 2006

The biggest football game ever played takes place tonight. FC Barcelona meet Arsenal in Paris for the Champions' League final. We've followed them all the way from their lowly beginnings as Spanish league champions at the start of this season, through their vicious clash with Cheating Chelsea, to now where once again, they're Spanish league champions.

I'm sure they can do it, but as per tradition, if this post disappears, you'll know that Sol Campbell managed to deal with Ronaldnho.

We'll be watching the game, as usual, at the Penya Barcelonista de Cerdanyola del Vallés. This great bar is also headquarters of the town's chess club, several domino teams and most importantly, the Cerdanyola Pipe Smoking Association.

thebadrash.com sponsors Barcelona Reporter

Saturday - 13 May 2006

I've agreed a mini-sponsorship deal with the excellent Barcelona Reporter website. I'm supporting the politics section, mainly because I probably access the site about ten or twenty times a day. For those who haven't yet looked at Barcelona Reporter, the site acts as a news portal, collecting news and blog posts about Barcelona and Catalonia. Spanish and Catalan news stories are translated into English and visitors can comment on any story which interests them.

thebadrash.com is picked up in their 'Snippets' section fairly regularly (I'm in competition with Nick here), and I regularly enjoy posting comments and discussing articles and issues there.

Spain Herald might not like your name

Saturday - 13 May 2006

Just a quick note about this: if your name is Catalan, writers at the Spain Herald will do their best to hispanicise it. Case in point: John Aust (who's radicalised again somewhat) refers to Josep Duran i Lleida (a CiU politician, thought to be a candidate for the Catalan premiership in the future) as 'Duran Lerida'.

The secret behind how Duran i Lleida becomes Duran Lerida should be obvious to most people living here: Lerida is the Spanish name for the Catalan city of Lleida. Duran i Lleida is only ever referred to as 'Duran Lerida' in Spanish nationalist and right wing publications. It's all a pretty sad attempt to persist with a linguistic supremacy which, were it being perpetrated by Catalans would certainly invoke rage and fury in those same publications.

This sort of attitude belies the lack of conviction and the general shallowness of thought which permeates right-wing Spanish politics. Besides which, it strikes me as damned bad form to change a man's name without asking him. Oh yeah, and doesn't Lérida have an accent?

Catalan government crisis

Friday - 12 May 2006

CAT1.jpeg Yesterday, after weeks of speculation, the regional president, Pasqual Maragall sacked all six Catalan Republican Left (ERC) ministers from the coalition government. The move, which was widely expected, led to ERC stating that it intended to remove not just its ministers, but all governmental staff who were party activists.

The reason behind ERC's removal from the tri-partit is that they have decided to vote against the Estatut (see here for more information), which they feel has been watered down so much that they can't support it. Esquerra claim that they have been double-crossed by the Spanish Socialist party (PSOE, of which Maragall is the regional leader), and that promises to uphold the Estatut as it was passed by the Catalan parliament were broken.

The Socialists argue that ERC have been obstructive and unwilling to negotiate the text of the Estatut. It is this intractability which the PSOE blame for the coalition's collapse. The PSOE, having made a new deal with the conservative opposition CiU, enraged ERC to the point where cooperation would become impossible.

A Catalan referendum on the Estatut will take place in just over a month, with the PSOE, CiU and smaller leftist groups pushing for a 'yes' vote, while ERC and (as unusual bedfellows) Spanish nationalists PP asking for the 'no'. I'm not aware of what the margin in favour needs to be in order to pass the Estatut into law but if it's anything like 50%, the 'yes' camp have a good chance of winning. If the Estatut fails in the referendum, it has the potential to seriously damage not just the Catalan Socialists, but their party comrades in government in Madrid. A 'no' vote would likely benefit ERC in the forthcoming elections – and could grant them more power than they've had in the recent coalition. That said, it would be difficult to identify just why people had voted against…

Whichever side of the fence you're on though, you must agree on one thing: ERC have so far handled this matter with a huge lack of political nouse, whereas the PSOE have been very successful in their dealings with other parties. Granted, Esquerra are obviously committed to independence for Catalonia, and felt that by agreeing to the text that is currently on the table, they would be delaying further moves in that direction for another generation. They've played a risky game, but so have the Socialists. Who wins (and I have a pretty good hunch who it'll be) will reap the rewards after June 18th. The losers will run the risk of consigning themselves to history.

Those horrid Catalans

Thursday - 11 May 2006

Whenever the topic of Catalan devolution is argued about, at least one person will draw attention to the 'fact' that Catalans are rude and horrible people. The argument, though it has absolutely no bearing on the topic of devolution, is fallacious, and is employed as a tactic to make the debate about the conduct of Catalans rather than the fact of their desire for further devolution from Spain.

The classic form of this argument is: "Why should I have to speak in Catalan when I know they speak Spanish?". This is generally asked by foreign visitors to Barcelona who have allegedly undergone awful treatment at the hands of vicious Catalan waiters, shop-keepers and officials all intent on making their lives a misery.

My first response to the question is that it's just good manners to make an effort to connect with people when you come to their country. If I have dinner at a house where they say grace before eating, I don't just sit on the sofa with the TV on waiting for them to finish. I'll go along with it, bow my head and say Amen with the rest of them. Similarly, in Catalonia, I'll make an effort to say just a few words in Catalan: of course people here speak Spanish, but a lot of them speak English too and would we really expect them to deal with us only in the language most convenient to ourselves? This smacks of a huge double-standard. Is it really the Catalans who are obstructing communication? Or is it the people who refuse to make any effort whatsoever to use the local language?

My second argument is much simpler: this never happens anyway. Catalans do not refuse to speak in Spanish to people. This is a lie which is bandied about by people who've had some sort of bad experience here. How can I make this claim, I hear you ask? Simple: I've lived here for four years. In this time, I've visited numerous (hundreds) of bars, restaurants, night clubs, shops, bakeries, offices of the state and businesses. From Cadaques to the Ebre, from Vic and Lleida to Sort and Tarragona, I've travelled all around this country and not once have I experienced this alleged rudeness. I've probably had contact with thousands of Catalans and not a single one has ever treated me in this way.

Indeed, my experiences suggest that the true situation is the opposite of what the original question suggests: I have found that if I'm talking with a Catalan and trying to get by in Catalan, they will invariably switch to Spanish or English to make things easier for me. This can be very frustrating when you're trying to learn Catalan, but it's done out of courtesy and kindness rather than any malicious intent.

Why is it then that my experiences with Catalans and language seem so totally contradictory to those of the complainers? I can only assume that the extent of this rudeness and bad behaviour is grossly exagerrated by people who have a fixed anti-Catalan agenda.

Stones' Barcelona gig delayed

Monday - 8 May 2006

The Rolling Stones 'A Bigger Bang' European tour, due to kick off in Barcelona on the 27th of May has been postponed until June to allow for the recovery of Keith Richards, who underwent further surgery today after falling out of a palm tree in Fiji.

Seems that he had some sort of brain hemorrhage. Get well soon, Keith

The tour's new schedule will be revealed soon.